"Effectively, what is happening is the measurement circumstance is
changing from free-field (4-pi) to half-space (2-pi) as the frequency
increases and the wavelength decreases to something approaching the
overall area of the baffle. This creates a response ‘step’ of about 6
dB, the frequency of the step being dependent upon the baffle area. The
effect is most pronounced on-axis, as the baffle causes a beaming
phenomenon like a [sic] -automobile headlight reflector."
While what is said is mostly correct, it does make one wonder:
* How does the wave know how large the baffle is?
* Why 6 dB?
* Are there any other effects?
* Are two baffles equivalent if they have the same area but vastly
different dimensions, e.g. a 30 cm X 30 cm baffle vs. a 5 cm X 180 cm
baffle?
In my opinion, the key to developing an intuitive or
quantitative understanding of cabinet edge diffraction is by studying it
primarily the time domain and resorting to the frequency domain only
when absolutely necessary. Once the effect is understood in the time
domain, it is easily translated to the frequency domain by using the
Fourier transform.
Imagine an ideal point source hemispherical
radiator mounted on the exact center of the end of a long cylindrical
solid. Such a radiator will exhibit a hemispherical radiation pattern
that is independent of frequency. In addition, let us suppose it
exhibits minimum phase characteristics and has flat frequency response
over all frequencies. If we now excite the radiator with a discrete-time
impulse of duration 0.025 mS, it will move in response to the impulse
and stimulate a hemispherical acoustic impulse moving away from the
point source at the speed of sound. Since the radiator is perfect, the
acoustic impulse will have a shape identical to the discrete-time
impulse.
Everything is very easy to visualize until the edge of the
impulse reaches the edge of the cylinder. When the impulse reaches the
edge of the cylinder, there is a sudden loss of support as the impulse
is now free to radiate behind the face of the cylinder, not just in
front of it. In this way, the impulse ‘diffracts’ or ‘scatters’ behind
the face of the cylinder. Interestingly, this scattering is frequency
independent, but angle dependent. So if we measured the acoustic signal
behind the cylinder, we would find that it is an impulse identical to
the one formed by the radiator but somewhat diminished in magnitude.
Now, few of us set up our favorite listening spot behind our
loudspeakers, so it makes sense to try to understand what happens in
front of the loudspeaker. Due to the loss of support at the edge of the
cylinder, the impulse will partially collapse as some of the pressure
‘leaks’ backwards and this causes a secondary impulse to scatter in the
forward direction. Like the impulse scattered behind the cylinder, the
forward-scattered impulse will also be frequency independent but angle
dependent. Unlike the backward-scattered impulse, though, the
forward-scattered impulse will have the opposite polarity as the
original impulse. Now imagine a microphone located in front of and on
the cylinder axis, far away from the cylinder. What will the microphone
measure? First, the impulse from the radiator will be picked up then,
delayed by an amount equal to the radius of the cylinder divided by the
speed of sound, the forward-scattered impulse will be measured.
Now,
as stated previously, neither the forward nor the backward-scattered
impulses display frequency dependence. However, taken together, the
direct and forward-scattered impulses will result in frequency
dependence through constructive and destructive interference. Figure 1
and Figure 2 show the time and frequency domain behavior of the impulse
as measured by a microphone located in front of and on the cylinder
axis, far away from the cylinder. The radius of the cylinder is 1 meter
and the radiator is mounted in the center of the baffle.